“If a practice encourages a particular demographic to behave in a specific manner, there is a natural curiosity to see if there is an exception.” I said this in a discussion with a valued associate (not sure how to classify “friend” yet.)

The demographic subject to the practice is the majority of the demographic that exists. Due to it being the majority, the classification that it was under the condition of the practice is ignored and the speaker is viewed as judging the entire demographic.

(if i were to suggest something about the female demographic that exist under the Mormon practice, no offence would be taken to the demographic outside of that practice because it is well acknowledged what the practice does to the demographic, and the practicing group is small enough for the audience to separate it’s relationship to the demographic)

Appeal to the sensitive population to get what I want, or be a straight bullet.

The only reason I’ve changed is because someone showed sensitivity to my previous conditions. To change the world I need to change the people that have power. The people that have power over my next level of success are the majority. The majority of the majority is the demographic that is under subjection the opposed practice.

Fine, I’ll change.

The question that started this has no place. It’s already answered or otherwise no woman could tell the story of rejecting her former religion. And I know for a fact such stories do exist.

Simply an expression of hopelessness.