What if I told you, “faith in Jesus” is a RELIGION?

And just because you’ve spoken words, doesn’t change its definition.

If Jesus is just a relationship, why the book of laws?

By the definition of “Religion”, it’s a rule for cosmic cause

If Jesus is just a friendship, why push BELIEF of the unseen

Discount the delusions, “quote unquote” visions, and acid tripping dreams


So Jesus preaches FAITH, but there’s another thing I don’t understand,

How is rape, murder and HATE, forgiven by the torture of another man

No really, what does this say about our justice system?

That if I slaughtered 30 men I could free 30 in prison?

No really, how much does Jesus’ death ACTUALLY weigh?

If it just permits common evils, so long as they put faith in what YOU say?

No really, how do you justify a sacrifice

For progress, responsibility is the only thing that qualifies

 

 

Call me judgmental but more importantly call me decisive

Because there’s a problem when you sugar coat Jesus, it’s called misguidance.

In every other aspect of life you know your logic’s Swiss cheese

It’s like saying “we play basketball, but it’s not a sport, it’s a team…”

It’s like if Coka-Cola said Coke is Coke and not a soda

Or if this isn’t actually a phone, because it’s really Motorola

Honestly I’m sick of this — this loss of words kills production

If you’re going to convince, do so with logic, not rhythmatic seduction

 

 

These are crucial times we’re living in, give me reason or give me death

Don’t take away the beauty, just take away the rest.

The following’s not to you, but let me address all concerned

Our hope’s not with Christ, but human RELATIONS we must learn

This much we can agree on, a Revelation is soon at hand

But how we interpret the cause of this unveiling should strictly be with man.

Again, as a message to ALL, let our mortality make us hunger

Quest for knowledge, Quest for love, for without these we are plundered.

I can’t stress this enough, it is deeply on my conscious

I know I’ve made my decision, but tell me what your response is.


because I think so much of myself.
this was in response to someone who posted a stabby religious comment in a thread about “the beginning of the universe”

because I think so much of myself.

this was in response to someone who posted a stabby religious comment in a thread about “the beginning of the universe”


From: lyinglyre
Your checkmate christianity post made no point at all against any of the fundamental teachings of the religion itself. You don't throw loosely quoted facts that are not in the Bible to disprove the Bible. You take parts of the Bible that are fallible and tear it apart at the seams. How about this one: In Genesis, the Tree of the Life and the Tree of Knowledge are separated. So how can you expect to learn any knowledge at all about life from it?

They may be “loosely” quoted, but they are facts of the bible. God did kill 50 kids with bears. God did split the languages. etc.

If parts of the bible are fallible, then accepting it as a whole is fallible. Sure, there are some good things like “don’t steal/rape/murder” but I’m attacking the god story they are suggesting, not every moral teaching.

You say “from it”. I can only assume you’re referring to “the tree of knowledge”. If this tree were to grant knowledge, what problem would the TOL (tree of life) being separate from the TOK (tree of knowledge) present? The TOK just gives knowledge in this case. The TOL gives life. Their functionality isn’t dependent on unity.


  • Jesus’ death did nothing.
  • What’s so special about blood
  • dinosaurs … meant to suffer? funny. I thought all animals were plant eaters at the beginning (according to the bible)
  • is free will random?
  • what good does knowing of a god do now. People will have the wrong motivation to be good.
  • Splitting the languages… oh yeah, not such a hot idea. What’s wrong with reaching the skies? We just did it like 40 years ago, and you didn’t do jack nothing.
  • So you mean to tell me that in 500 years, we made Japanese people, Indians, whites blacks Native-Americans and more? … African imports were 200 years ago, yet they still look the same.
  • “freewill” (whatever that is) has no inherit value. So why install it?
  • your prophecies don’t require divine wisdom or intervention.
  • Suddam Hussein (an Arab) pitched a couple tents in the city of Babylon.
    Not to mention Alexander the Great.
  • Your chastity neglects biological needs. Biological needs you claim originate with god.
  • Where does disease come from?
  • God says man can not guide their own foot step, but if we’ve had supernatural intervention the whole time, what proof does he have?
  • So what happen to the other books of the bible? God make some edits?
  • You really need to kill 50 kids with bears?

#Checkmate

Just wanted to wrap this into one nice little bundle.


#checkmate

Unfortunately they didn’t realize it.
The only way that a “free will given” robot can make a decision is with the components it is built from and the information it receives from its environment.

If we are nothing more than our components (which is the case) then the only way for Satan to become evil was because something influenced him from god’s “perfect” environment.

Here is one interesting sequence I went through:

“Why did satan do the first bad thing?”
“Because he had a bad heart that wanted god’s position”
“Isn’t the want a bad thing? Ok, that was the first bad thing, what started that?”
“He was letting his emotions out of control”
“Ok, so wait, that was the first bad thing… How in the world did his emotions get out of control?”
“Free will”
“Is free will just random? If so, wouldn’t that mean that god subjected everyone to random chance of screwing up and being damned as the ultimate evil?”
“No, it was Satan’s choice…”
“Satan’s choice are developed somehow… HOW IS THAT?”
“free will”
“How does free will work if it’s not random and it’s not based on anything predictable?”
“It’s what you want it to be”
“Do you understand that our entire brain is the sum of it’s components?”
“Yes”
“If we make a bad decision, it’s because those components were in a bad order”
“Right”
“Who made our brains and satan’s ability to think?”
“God”
“So did he make them out of order?”
“No, it was free will”
… need I go on?

#todo
ask : “When did those components of the brain get out of order?”
Most likely response “when Satan wanted them to”
“Those components are what dictate his decision, so how can he want them to if his want is derived from those components?”

I’ve gotten this before: “everything is so technical with you? it’s not that complex!”
And so I’ve said: “it’s not complex, you just don’t understand how things work”


Let’s say you damage an embryo before it became (what you’ll personally have to consider) “human”. The (now) “Human” has defective parts. Should you be held responsible for your actions? Could the creature have been aborted though? Would you still have to be punished?


So long as you ignore the references to “the four corners of the earth” (easily exchangeable with “the cardinal directions”) and “the pillars of the earth” the bible was pretty right on when it talks about the earth hanging from nothing and being round. Though some may humanize this and say that the stated fact was an easy guess because everything else they saw in the sky was round, and hanging upon nothing.

Jeremiah 23:27 talks about god knowing how people will try to erase his name. No, it’s not completely eradicated. But it’s quite curious as to why it was stripped out during translation.
“Don’t use my name in vein” doesn’t mean don’t use it at all, in fact not using it is more damaging to his desire to be worshiped.

Rabbits are chewers of the Cud.

All of these things are mostly out of human reach. I doubt anyone studied rabbits that much and then decided to put that in the bible.
A lot of non-believers will also try to insist that the Hebrew word describing the earth meant STRICTLY like a disc or flat circle. To this, I say “spare me”. But at the same time I’ll have to admit, “Where the hell are these pillars coming from?”. I can understand 4 corners = 4 cardinal directions. But “pillars” is really beyond me.
I also think it’s quite a stretch to insist that “Don’t use my name in vein” is what really battered away god’s name (Jehovah)
The phrase itself is saying “Don’t use my name wastefully” which REALLY DOES imply USE IT EFFECTIVELY… which means USE IT.

Figured I’d write this just to let others know I’m not neglecting due credit.

—————————————————————————————————-

BTW: I’m not saying that the bible was right about the picture. I’m just putting that up there because that’s what I’ve come from.


This is an evolution simulation. Pretty simple. (not immediately intuitive though)

Check it out, download the simulation.
The simulation is available for download HERE


Even when I left that faith, for a short while I hesitated to speak against them simply because I would be labeled an apostate. And the social consequences of that were immense; not just for me, but my family also.

I met some JW’s at the clinic this morning. Previously someone had placed a watchtower in the magazine bin. I picked it up and looked at it. I haven’t seen one in a long time. That was the conversation starter. I eventually got to the point where I told them I was raised one but dropped out when I was 18.

They talked about the time of the end, the prophecies and talked about the evil people of today.
I let them talk for the most part. I’ve always wanted to see what it was like on the other side of the fence.
I had gotten what I came for at the clinic (some receipts) and they were more than welcome to keep talking. And I wanted them to, because I was about to bust out in debate mode. I addressed the vague qualities of the Nebuchadnezzar statue Prophecy (the only one mentioned at the time) , I also addressed the “why the world is so full of mean people” .

Then they had to go.

Earlier in this blog, I think I’ve countered many Christian supports. I’m not going to go in depth with debating religion anymore because the educational process has a side effect of deteriorating it’s existence anyway. Engaging in technology, philosophy and the sciences also help expose the individual to the logical fallacies associated with theistic religions.

It was an interesting experience.