It’s important that people are comfortable.
It’s also important that we’re not always divided.
I think uncontrolled cyber immigration allows for smoother controlled geographical immigration. People can first understand a culture before actually injecting themselves in a face-to-face situation. Is this how you see it?
I’ve had an idea for a social network for a long time. The features are enough to capture the interests of many people. I know it is not a tool for everyone though. The trouble is making it intuitive. I’ve failed, time and time again trying to lock in a good design that makes my devices easy to navigate.
I don’t want to make ANOTHER hub. I’m beginning to think that twitter, youtube, facebook and the alike stand well enough on their own.
There are some things from the people I follow that I just don’t want to see, my mind establishes “trends” and eventually I just block that person/entity out.
For example. Science Daily on twitter spews out A WHOLE LOT OF STUFF.
I appreciate all science, but I know that I need to focus on what is relevant to me now so that I can progress my agenda.
At the same time I don’t want to have to go to their and use their filters.
Ok, maybe I do want to make a hub for social networks. Does anyone experience this same challenge (regarding my science daily example)? Tweet deck and many other hubs allow you to create multiple stream groups. Twitter allows you to create lists… but science daily, and others, are still going to post to that 1 account that floods in unwanted information, because really, it’s too much to carry multiple accounts.
Tumblr has done something grand. I can have multiple accounts managed by 1. I can even share accounts with people. It still has a ways to go, but this is something that has become extremely important for me. I understand tweetdeck and that owl thing (no disrespect intended, I just forgot what it is) allow 1 to control multiple twitter accounts, but the bothersome part is that I have to create multiple twitter accounts -_-’ still. That means a NEW email per.
I’d really like to go into detail with needs that I see.
But I’m in fear of someone quenching those needs before I can make a business out of it.
Sure, it’s a good thing that the service is available, but I have an agenda and a way of doing things that I can’t trust many others to carry. I’m capable of getting by, but I’d prefer to be on top so that I can lead the whole process.
I’ll throw some stuff on my Globalist youtube channel and see what ideas I can pick up. There may be some prodigy out there waiting to snatch up ideas though. I already know of … 1.
Maybe I’m awfully paranoid.
Slavery preserves the mystery yet controls it.
For a few to live like gods, many must be enslaved?
Am I losing it?
My mind lives with naive ideals (globalism). To maintain my sanity, I must resort to tribalism. Such is a sin to me.
Doing such will slow me down. And I don’t want to be slowed down by even a fraction.
But I may also come to a dead halt if I don’t have companionship. (of any nature)
Companionship being something you can only attain from this tribal-like divided society.
I’m forced to spend loyalty to falsehoods, logical fallacies, and the core of all hurt, lack of understanding.
The cost & benefit analysis has been defined, and it means that I’m going to fuck a lot of you up really badly. I’m going to do something illogical for the sake of keeping a friend. I’m going to reject understanding, and embrace lies. For the sake of keeping a friend.
If dedicated entirely to spreading & preserving truth & happiness, you’ll miss out on your own cake. Become isolated and sink into the madness that burns you to fight against everything you built.
I do not want to go down that path.
This world is far to severed for me to even come close to dedicating myself to truth and logic (even with some investment in actually expressing my own happiness)
I don’t want to become a machine for humanity. I can’t do that. I want to be apart of it to.
“With great power comes great responsibility”
“knowledge is power”
“90% of life is what you do with it”
So if I have this right, the people who say “I can know a lot” are responsible for everything. They know they can learn. That knowledge could save millions.
30 years of my life (career term), and I could give 30 years in addition to every human existing, and every human to ever exist.
If there was a button that you had to press for 10 minutes and in return, you were guaranteed the solution to humanity. Would you press it for 10 minutes?
Let’s increase the demand. Let’s say 1 hour.
Let’s say a solid 24 hours.
Let’s say you had to press it all day for 30 years straight.
When is the cost too much for your own damn sanity?
When do you say “no, that’s too much to ask of me”?
I was at point where nothing would be too much to ask, but then I fell in love.
In love with the idea of “friends”, “family”, “a mate”… love that will subject me to their closed perception of reality, their falsehoods, their logical fallacies, their inefficiencies. Every nano second I spend with them is 100 million future lives that could have been saved. It’s 1 million light years we could have traveled. It’s 1 trillion loving people I would have had the power to insure existed.
anyway, I already have my answers. I’m done for the night.
How would you like the world to be? AND what are some immediate events that you would like to see take place in order to bring the world to that state?
My controversial ideas are within this link.
Simply automate all the monotonous jobs.
Drop your monetary way of thinking.
Make sure you have your technology organized in such a way that the A.I. isn’t making a wide range of decisions for itself… That’ll fuck you over when something mutates when it intercepts disorganized information.
You’re going to have to work hard. Yes.
Ready for arguments.
I’m not able to do it under my current conditions btw. SO yeah.
Also… centralize all human goals
